I can’t believe I haven’t written about Mona Shaw before, because she’s become a hero to frustrated consumers everywhere who must cope with companies that have a virtual monopoly on some corner of our lives, such as the providers of trash pick-up, energy, phone and cable service – companies that hold you practically hostage (or at least it can feel that way), because you have nowhere else to go.

I had my own experience with one of these companies in the past week – Time Warner Cable – and once again I was reminded that all the marketing in the universe cannot make up for one customer service representative who treats me like I just fell off the turnip truck.

The short version is that, for over a week, I had intermittent high-speed cable service. Do you understand? No Internet connection. I mean, didn’t I come out of the womb with an Internet connection? No? Inconceivable!

I spoke to many representatives. Those that treated me like an idiot made me angry – not at the CSR, necessarily, but at Time Warner Cable. Then the second representative who had to come to my apartment in person restored my belief in humanity by fixing the problem, cleaning up after himself, validating my feelings of frustration and wishing me a good day.

Why do consumers have wild “mood swings” like this? How can one person in a call center destroy years of corporate spending and goodwill?
 
                          stephanie-fierman-on-comcast-customer-service.gif

It’s because it’s not about the product. It’s about a much deeper human need for respect, understanding and honesty.  Too many marketers think that marketing is “the fun stuff” – advertising, PR and whatnot.   Not true.  Marketing must become a student of the entire customer lifecyle, including – maybe most importantly, in many cases – the touchpoint at which the customer and company make contact. 

If you don’t put Customer Service up on a pedestal – push them, but provide solutions, too – you’re dead.

So back to Mona “The Hammer” Shaw of Bristow, VA. Certainly Mona was reacting to a particular seriess of prior events with Comcast when she entered a local office and began bashing phones, keyboards and monitors with a hammer, but her words indicate that what really made her angry was how she and her husband were treated: “[Comcast] thought [that] just because we’re old enough to get Social Security that we lack both brains and backbone.” In other words, a little respect goes a long way. Tara Hunt writes a great post on this very topic, triggered by a recent experience she had with a rental car company.

What’s most interesting to me is that the traits Tara assigns to companies that make customers happy vs. those that make them crazy once again have nothing to do with product quality. In old direct marketing-speak, decent product execution is almost “hygiene,” and consumers do understand that a product or service may not work sometimes. No one takes a hammer to your phone because your product failed: they do so because (a) you put them in a corner with no choice, (b) you duped them (Mona and her husband waited two hours in Comcast’s local office only to be told that the person for whom they were waiting had left) and (c) you treated them poorly.

Companies in these one-choice industries are exactly the ones who have the opportunity to delight customers right into buying additional services. So why is the reality too often the opposite? Where is the rest of the organization when a CSR takes a call?  Is that person adequately trained and ready? If not (and that’s an enterprise-wide responsibility),  treating a customer poorly will overwhelm a new-and-improved widget or ad campaign every time.

If CMOs and CEOs don’t focus on ”experience delivery” and include relationship-oriented customer service metrics when they calculate marketing ROI, they’re missing a vital part of the success equation.

Please check out my new daily blog at http://www.stephaniefiermanmarketingdaily.blogspot.com, and consider subscribing for quick takes on news and trends of the day.

 

Related Posts

2 Responses to “Stephanie Fierman On Why Marketers (Should) Worship Customer Service”

  1. Tom Feister Says:

    Hi Stephanie,

    I doubt you remember me but we met a few years ago at San Diego Con. I wanted to take a minute to tell you how much I enjoy reading your blog. It makes for fascinating reading.

    Keep it coming,

    Tom

  2. John Guerra Says:

    Interesting. (and no doubt, there are always exceptions to the norm), yet I think, from the CSR perspective, that what is missed is that there is a lot of ‘expectations’ from customers that don’t start with mutual respect. In other words, I receive a lot of calls tha start out with “Account number” or “Service call”, not an hello, not any other lead in and then the customer who called us acts as if they don’t have time for us to do the job that they have requested that we do. And it is also my experience as a CSR that you don’t really want to tick off the CSR you have on the phnoe because any CSR on the egde, is likely to use the information we have on the customer in some type of backlash. When it comes to agents who work in cable also may have some sensitive information so it is best to maintain an even keel with agents. In my experience, if you at least speak with some sense and don’t make threats, even if you are angry at the company, you will be fine. But people (customers) should be aware that (we) have a lot of information on (you) the customer.

    I once sat across from an agent who was so mad at our cable company, aside from threatening to throw equiment out in the yard, cutting other people’s line to get a tech out he also made a threat to come down and blow the place up. (mind you this is after 9/11). The agent calmly kept him on the phone asking him to hold, as if to get a supervisor, and actually called 911. She stayed on the line until the phone call was cut short due to the local SWAT team breaking down his door and arresting him.

    Respect goes both ways. Many of us are more educated then some of our customers, i.e., we took these jobs because of the job market but we have aspirations, families and concerns too. We should not need to be treated like 3rd world country employees just because some jobs have been outsourced. (and even then, why would you treat or talk to someone in that manner regardless of where they are from when you are asking for help). In my mind, whether it’s cable, office supplies or bevearges, a lack of product or a need for service is not life and death. Only if you are in a life and death struggle should such loud energies be expended. I had a call from a ‘gentleman’ who said that I should not cut off his cable because it was not his fault that his wife had driven around with the bill in the glove compartment for a month (even though he was 90 days past due) and as his anger rose he then threw in that his wife and daughter were now in the hospital and that this was causing him stress. So, if you are that stressed over cable instead of your immediate family, something is very wrong. Or there was the lady who claimed that because her name was mispelled, Noelle instead of Noel, that she should not have to pay her bill, even though it was spelled that was for six years. We are not stupid, we are probably the most tolerant/patient people there are. However, customers should know that they cross a line when they do mak ethe jabs personal and therefore, again, watch what you do, we know who you are and where you are; we don’t use it, but if you tick off the right person, they just might…

Leave a Reply